How to introduce your boyfriend's girlfriends to your grandma who is actually girlfriend of your boyfriend.

2021.11.29 04:57 kintokiOKM1 How to introduce your boyfriend's girlfriends to your grandma who is actually girlfriend of your boyfriend.

How to introduce your boyfriend's girlfriends to your grandma who is actually girlfriend of your boyfriend. submitted by kintokiOKM1 to Animemes [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 killua1zoldyck Filled wrong current visa type

I gave my current visa type as F1 for a US university by mistake. I thought it was asking for the visa type I would need to study there since that's what was asked in another university. How big of a problem is this and should I mail them regarding this?
submitted by killua1zoldyck to gradadmissions [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 hijohto Starting up a general purpose server! Feel free to join and invite anyone you'd like. <3

Starting up a general purpose server! Feel free to join and invite anyone you'd like. <3 submitted by hijohto to DiscordPromo [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 GoldenGoldieG Looking for a hair salon for balayage. Any recommendation?

Does anyone have salon recommendation in Roma Norte that speaks English?
submitted by GoldenGoldieG to MexicoCity [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 lodge28 What are your daily observations? - 29/11/21

submitted by lodge28 to london [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 Wesmtbot @FirstSquawk: The spread difference in December contracts in DINRI is at a premium of 9 ticks than DINR approximately @DGCX

http://twitter.com/FirstSquawk
via IFTTT
submitted by Wesmtbot to wesmt [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 Bedirhanikinci Check

submitted by Bedirhanikinci to ShadowBan [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 CavoTheCat Do people still play Fall Guys?

I have wanted to play it since it came out and after christmas i will finally be able to play it on PC, are there still common lobbies?
submitted by CavoTheCat to FallGuysGame [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 raaner12 El ETF de Bitcoin de EEUU favorece a la aprobación de Australia respecto a las criptomonedas

submitted by raaner12 to CryptoMonedas [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 Wesmtbot @FirstSquawk: The price difference in December Indian Rupee Futures Contracts between DGCX and onshore markets is 2 paisa approximately The price difference in December between DGCX Indian Rupee Quanto Futures Contracts and India onshore is 5 paisa approximately @DGCX

http://twitter.com/FirstSquawk
via IFTTT
submitted by Wesmtbot to wesmt [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 planestanleywaldo Any one interested in building there own wooden plane. I got this at a tool buy thought I was gonna complete but I've got to much on my plate already. Includes krenov style plane glue up, hock iron set and the book I have 2 copies of. The only task left is the final shaping and tuning...

submitted by planestanleywaldo to handtools [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 NoobtonicMaster What precautions should a person take to avoid being assassinated?

submitted by NoobtonicMaster to TooAfraidToAsk [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 TheDonald1 How can the Minister D tape be sincere and credible if this key detail is to be accounted for from the same period in time, and can be verified through cross checking of early episodes? A perfect example of the early mythology contradicting the later mythology, an INTENTIONAL move I believe

Three major developments occurred in the Fall of 1990 with Katarina and Raymond. Two of them surround and take place after the main event of Masha being taken from the Summer Palace in Canada by Raymond. What is both irrational and perplexing is that these two other developments clearly contradict one another. How is it that Katarina had no problem framing Raymond for a crime he did not commit as was allegedly revealed in the Minister D tape, and yet within that same time period according to Red in 3.14, Katarina, at some point after the kidnapping in the Fall of 1990 was also fighting for her and Raymond to be a family and wanted him back? She wanted him back and for them to be a family, but at the same time had no problem with the idea of framing him in which by default would force him to be a criminal on the run forced away from Katarina and Masha? Something is obviously not right with this picture.
Red: Your parents loved each other very much…
Your mother, despite what he’d done, she wanted him back. She wanted them to be a family
I would also like to mention that I believe this detail has been forgotten about over time since it was last discussed five seasons ago. And because of this it has been neglected and many analyses since when debating the true nature of the relationship between Raymond (the real/original) and Katarina. Especially following the Minister D episode from season 6 and the recorded call between Katarina and Fitch.
So here is the simple question. How would Katarina’s “better way” approach by framing him help them be a family?
“And I’m telling you there’s a better way”
How was this the best way when she also was fighting for her family that included Raymond?
Red: Your parents loved each other very much…
Your mother, despite what he’d done, she wanted him back. She wanted them to be a family
In fact it would only serve to hurt and destroy her cause she was fighting for because there was no way they could be a family if Raymond was a criminal on the run. He would be forced away from Katarina and Masha. Completely the opposite result of what Red told Liz her mother wanted and was fighting for. She would have been responsible for killing her own aspirations. Putting so much of her energy into fighting for her family and yet in absolutely perplexing fashion appears on the surface to hurt her own self by informing Fitch that Raymond is an immediate threat and needed to be dealt with ASAP?
Psychopath? Bipolar disorder? Or was that tape a charade designed to exonerate Raymond if necessary and things are not what they seem?
Did Red lie to Liz in 3.14 about her mother? My instinct is Redarinists, and even Third Man theorists, will claim that this was an example of Red lying to Liz, this time about her mother’s true thoughts and feelings about Raymond and who he was to her. Therefore this brings simplicity to the contents of the Minister D tape that shows Katarina, instead of wanting Raymond back and for them to be a family, she suggests to frame the only man she ever loved as a traitor all designed to make him appear as a criminal on the run.
Problem solved, right? He lied. No mystery no contradiction. Except no. Not only do we have Red’s words to analyze and be forced to wonder if he lied or was honest, but we also have Katarina’s OWN WORDS, FROM HER DIARY that parallel in logic to and compliment Red’s testimony to Liz,
“The Agency requires answers. They contacted me today. I have told them another lie…. I cannot keep my thoughts in order. ONLY WITH RAYMOND I AM HONEST”
“YOUR PARENTS LOVED EACH OTHER VERY MUCH”
“Your mother, despite what he’d done, SHE WANTED HIM BACK. SHE WANTED THEM TO BE A FAMILY”
“He took you from her. She gave up everything to follow him. As much as it pains me to say it, HE WAS PROBABLY THE ONLY MAN SHE EVER LOVED”
But this logic MAKES PERFECT sense. The only man/individual Katarina was honest with (by her own private admission about Raymond), was the only man she ever loved and the man she wanted to be a family with (Red’s own words about Katarina on Raymond). So we have BOTH Red AND Katarina making statements about Katarina’s thoughts and feelings towards Liz’s father that parallel in logic to one another.
So no, the contradiction in Katarina’s thoughts and actions in the Fall of 1990 after Raymond took her from Canada (suggesting to frame him making him a criminal on the run, and yet wanting Raymond back and for them to be a family) can not be credibly explained by claiming Red simply lied to Liz in 3.14, which could still keep the Minister D tape on solid footing.
Why not claim Katarina also lied in her diary, right? Since the entry I cited logically compliments Red’s words? Both Red and Katarina lied about her mindset towards Raymond in these specific instances. Not impossible I guess. Except we can’t just claim Katarina lied in her diary at that point because as I pointed out in a previous post we can validate and confirm other contents from the document.
“Today, the doctor confirmed our worst fears. Constantin is going to need blood transfusions to raise his blood count. He’s known his whole life this day might come, but still it’s– it’s terrifying. The only blessing is that this accursed disease that has afflicted his family for generations is passed from father to son and that Masha is safe.
This detail was confirmed in season 4 where we saw Constantin sick and needing blood transfusions that would save his life. And this is how we also found out he was not Liz’s father because when she gave her stem cells to try to save his life we discovered they were not a match. And only a family relative was able to perform this act.
Colonel Wright: Your prisoner’s in the end stages of aplastic anemia
An average person has between 150 to 400,000 platelets per microliter of blood. Mr. Kirk’s is under 10,000. I’d expect to see intracranial bleeding within hours
Liz: He’s been receiving transfusions for many years
Wright: Unless he has a blood relative willing to donate stem cells his body won’t reject, your prisoner will be dead by morning
Liz: His only hope is for a blood relative to donate stem cells
Liz: I’m not giving you my blood
It was the whole reason why Red needed Dr. Adrian Shaw. Not to hurt or kill Constantin, but to cure him and save his life from his blood disease.
Shaw: Mr. Reddington, I was on the verge of patenting cutting-edge research that would’ve saved countless lives. I had to restore my credentials as a doctor, and thanks to you, I’ve lost it all again
Red: Dr. Shaw is standing by in a fully assembled lab waiting for you
Ressler: We thought he kidnapped Dr. Shaw in order to make sure that Kirk died. But the truth is, he kidnapped her hoping to keep Kirk alive
Samar: The data recovered from Kirk’s lab indicates that Reddington was trying to prove to Kirk that Shaw could save him
But since we have on screen canon to verify Katarina’s entry about Constantin’s illness let’s also go back to the scene from 3.14 in question and analyze another aspect of Red’s statement. Would anyone bother challenging the honesty of this part of his statement too for that matter and claim he was lying to Liz?
“When the Soviet Union was collapsing, he took you from her. She gave up everything to follow him, to follow you”
Everything in this part of his statement has also held true so far. We saw in Requiem that Liz/Masha had been taken from the Summer Palace and Katarina was willing to leave everything behind, both Constantin and her line of work, to follow both of them to the US. (Leave to the side the background specifics like her specific reference to the blonde man and her explanation as to why Masha was taken by Raymond. All that matters in this context are the actions: that Masha was taken and Katarina left Canada for the US to follow them.)
4.17:
“Masha was abducted…I know where he’s taking her. Home to America. I’m gonna have to find her on my own”
And we can even hear from one of the arguments from the night of the fire (likely between Katarina and Raymond) this issue being referenced,
2.10:
Woman: Where is she?
Man: You shouldn’t be here. You can’t be here
Woman: I’m not leaving without Masha
Man: Her name is Elizabeth
Woman: Masha!
Man: She’s not going back with you
Woman: You can’t take her from me. How could you steal her from me?
Man: I had to…You wouldn’t let me see her
So this part of Red’s statement in 3.14 is confirmed by on screen canon from 4.17 and 2.10. And Katarina’s diary and her words about Raymond compliments what Red told Liz. The only person she was honest with, Raymond, was the same man who Red told Liz was the only man Katarina ever loved and wanted to be a family with. Everything here adds up. And the credibility of her diary is also verified by the context of the Constantin arc and his sickness, which she mentioned in her diary.
Now let’s go back to this part of Red’s statement,
YOUR PARENTS LOVED EACH OTHER VERY MUCH…Your mother, despite what he’d done, SHE WANTED HIM BACK. SHE WANTED THEM TO BE A FAMILYHE WAS PROBABLY THE ONLY MAN SHE EVER LOVED”
I have already demonstrated from two other episode sources that the first part of Red’s statement about her father taking her from her mother and her giving up everything to follow them is indisputable. So how the heck can one then claim that the other part of his statement (emphasized above in bold) was a lie on his part when Katarina’s private words about Raymond in her diary clearly compliment Red’s words on Liz’s mother towards her father? Again, I am stressing this argument that centers around the idea he lied to her in anticipation that many will try to claim he did lie here as a way to uphold the sincerity of the Minister D tape that clearly contradicts his words in 3.14, to then explain why there clearly exists this contradiction in Katarina’s thinking and thought process from the contents of the tape, to then listening to Red’s testimony on Liz’s mother and father.
But don’t mind if I get extra creative for one moment?? There is actually ONE aspect of the Minister D tape that DOES confirm one major detail that Red told Liz in 3.14,
Katarina-Fitch: “He took Masha
And Red told Liz her father did take her from her mother,
“When the Soviet Union was collapsing, he took you from her. She gave up everything to follow him, to follow you”
But again it is this second major detail from that episode they hoped we forgot about three seasons later that rather conveniently completely contradicts the remainder of the tape.
“…she wanted him back. She wanted them to be a family. As much as it pains me to say it, he was probably… the only man she ever really loved”
So because I am confident that I have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that we can trust the dialogue from 3.14 by observing the cross checking of details from different episodes from the first half of the series (with even one of those details being repeated from the source in question) we then have to question why 99% of the remaining dialogue contradicts the Minister D tape so explicitly and why Katarina’s actions seem so bipolar in nature and counter intuitive to everything Red told Liz in 3.14 and Katarina’s own diary entry. Red’s words were honest and sincere. So we are left with one of two possibilities:

  1. We have what I call the “cop out argument” that the writers are bad and lazy and don’t care about accuracy or being careful in the storytelling at the end of the day, even if a set of details are confirmed through a cross reference of multiple or several episodes from the first half of the series
  2. The Minister D tape was not what it appeared to be, Katarina and Fitch plotting against Raymond on different sides of enemy lines, and was likely part of a charade that involved Raymond’s knowledge and participation. And in fact Raymond and Katarina were on the same side and were a part of the charade together. Hence the writers were trying to pull one on the audience
And I will even include a third option. For those who want to disregard the cross checking of the various episodes that show Raymond didn’t lie to Liz in 3.14 and still claim he lied to her in order to explain and justify the Minister D tape.
So the question is why did Katarina appear to be contradicting herself in such bipolar fashion in the Fall of 1990 after Raymond took Masha from her? She wanted him back and for them to be a family, and yet suggested an action to Fitch that would have kept Raymond apart from her and Masha forever? I think the solution is simple and right in front of our faces.
Is the second option really that far fetched when several episodes from the first half of the series are saying the same thing or complimenting each other? And that the conclusion from those episodes tells the same story about the nature of the relationship between Raymond and Katarina. And this conclusion narrative clearly contradicts the implications of the Minister D tape?
But I know what might be said. One of the episodes I cross referenced to confirm one part of Red’s words to Liz in 3.14 also has Katarina telling Kate she didn’t actually love Raymond, only Masha:
Kathryn: Do you love him?
Katarina: I don’t know about love, Kate. In my job the only one I know I love is Masha
Except we also know that Katarina lied to Kate about a list of things most notably her knowledge of the paternity. And she also withheld from Kate the existence of Dom and what he did as well as her allege activities with the Cabal. So anything she said to Kate needs to be taken with a grain of salt at minimum and likely deserves to be disregarded as untrustworthy.
Let’s put aside what Nachalo alleges for a second about Katarina and Raymond being enemies on opposite sides, especially after Raymond discovered he was allegedly being lied to. Because both 3.14 (about Liz’s parents loving each other, Raymond being the only man she ever loved, and Katarina wanting them to be a family) AND Katarina’s diary entry revealed in 4.02 and also read by Liz in 4.03 (about being honest only with Raymond) completely contradict 8.21, as well as Minister D. And let’s not get distracted by the claim that everything from the earlier seasons is irrelevant because the writers allegedly changed the story or stopped caring about accurate storytelling in the mythology. As opposed to respecting the original mythology through the entirety of the series, but in likelihood intentionally throw in contradictions to either confuse the audience and/or count on members of the audience forgetting about the earlier mythology as presented, which I believe is what they have done. As in the case of Nachalo, Rassvet and even the Minister D phone call, but especially in Minister D and Nachalo.
(And I am not even bothering arguing the point about Red saying he never lied to Liz because this is too subjective of a subject.)
But before I conclude I want to discuss two more important points. Some might say that Katarina only suggested framing Reddington at the last second in the Fall of 1990, pre-fire, was because the alternative Fitch was proposing was too cruel to do to Raymond. Katarina cared enough to want to spare him that fate and give him the opportunity to run, because there was the part of her that was accidentally falling for Raymond because she made the mistake of getting too close to him and as a result she was unable to walk away in time. Even Kate says something to this exact affect, or what she THOUGHT she knew from her POV.
“Please, do what your mother never had the courage to do until it was too late. Walk away from Raymond”
But here is the easy problem with this. Katarina had to have known that in informing Fitch about Raymond and Masha he was going to tell her to terminate him, or kill him. And as a result she would have to provide an alternative that Fitch was willing to accept that would still have the equal affect of damage control. But here is my question. Why did she bother informing Fitch in the first place knowing this was inevitable? Why would she place herself in that position by making Reddington into an immediate threat for Fitch? Why place a target on the man she wanted to be a family with? Why inform Fitch at all putting him on alert? Especially if she already secretly knew that Fitch was not on Reddington’s side?
If she never informed Fitch, whom she had to secretly know was not Raymond’s ally, he never would have ordered her to kill him and she as a result would not have had to suggest an alternative solution that Fitch would accept. In this case the choice to frame him. And if she had never said anything to Fitch inevitably compelling him to ordering her to take action against Raymond, forcing her hand by default into making her choose between two actions that would prove fatal to the man she loved, she could have still had a chance at them being a family with the man she had fallen in love with and her daughter.
“Your mother…she wanted him back. She wanted them to be a family…he was probably… the only man she ever really loved”
And yet the moment Katarina decided to inform Fitch about the “mess” involving Raymond, quite literary in the same time period, was when she ruined those wishes and desires about being a family with the only man she ever loved.
“I want this mess cleaned up. Get rid of him or ruin him. Just get it done by Christmas”
Even if from the Redarinist POV that meant the only man she ever really loved was the same man she supposedly accidentally fell in love with who was supposed to be Raymond,
“Look at me– in love with the man I was sent to seduce and betray.”
And coming from a different angle, as u/Keywestsheep noted recently how does it make sense that Katarina was Raymond’s cheating mistress when she was the one who wanted Raymond back for them to be a family? Why would Katarina want something/someone back who was not originally hers to begin with? By definition if she was only a “mistress” to Raymond then she never really came close to losing this “family” of hers that she needed to fight to have him back. In this scenario there was nothing to want back because Raymond was never hers from the start, but Carla’s. And why would Katarina want back the man who she was only allegedly spying on and using for intel? I can understand her in a scenario where she has to convince him to stay so that she could continue to extract intel from him to relay to the KGB, but not in a scenario where she wants him back because she wants them to be a family with a child in the picture and fight for the only man she ever truly loved.
This sounds more like a struggle between a married couple and husband and wife if what is being fought for is to save a family, as if even before the series of events transpired they were already by definition a family, but external circumstances forced them to play different roles. And this sounds like the type of scenario that “Carla Reddington” would have been in who would have been a married woman fighting for her marriage, wanting her husband back, and fighting for the security and preservation of her family. Since logically speaking it would make sense from her POV to want Raymond back, or to fight for him back, because he was her husband and her daughter’s father. Raymond was originally hers to begin with, not “Katarina Rostova’s.”
But this becomes even more interesting of a scenario, one which I pointed out more logically fits the kind of situation Carla would have been in with Raymond in terms of wanting him back and fighting to be a family, when we include the detail that the woman Red was referring to was Liz’s mother. So what we have is a scenario that better logically describes the situation “Carla Reddington” would be in with Raymond in terms of the married wife wanting her husband back and fighting to be a family (not your usual typical description of a mistress or cheating lover), and this same woman also being Liz’s mother. You connect the dots.
She wanted to be a family (with a man who was not originally hers and had a wife?), but also suggests to frame the man she wanted back for this family, the only man she ever truly loved and wanted as a part of this family, only after or around the same time she irrationally informs Fitch of the status of the man she loved and wanted back for this family, Raymond, Liz's father, where he would inevitably force her hand into taking action against the only man she loved and wanted to be a family with, making the man she loved into a fresh target and immediate threat, immediately voiding and upending her wishes to be a family with Raymond? Because instead of accomplishing this she actually accomplished destroying her wishes she had for her and Raymond simply by making that call to Fitch in the scenario where that phone exchange was sincere and credible.
submitted by TheDonald1 to TheBlackList [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 lss_bvt_ios_08 LssTest-TextPost-7615

Text post is created
submitted by lss_bvt_ios_08 to LssAutomation [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 Helpful_Positive_324 New Himalayan snake found via Instagram

New Himalayan snake found via Instagram submitted by Helpful_Positive_324 to vegan [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 freehelp1 The project is very outstanding with what they have been doing,

The project is very outstanding with what they have been doing, it can be said that this project will have a very strong development.
crytpo #blockchain #cryptocurrency #cloud #decentralized #altcoin #confidentiality #privacy #token #coin. submitted by freehelp1 to bounty_Discussion [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 _CringeMaster POV: lvl 50 playing against hardcore sweats (context: they just got our bed)

POV: lvl 50 playing against hardcore sweats (context: they just got our bed) submitted by _CringeMaster to hypixel [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 TGod1030 The comments on this Reddit post.

The comments on this Reddit post. submitted by TGod1030 to mildlysatisfying [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 cougarphilia Shreya Dhanwantari

Shreya Dhanwantari submitted by cougarphilia to JerkOff2DesiCelebs [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 42Unsmilingcat Cyberpunk and Junji Ito horror mashup according to Wombo

submitted by 42Unsmilingcat to Cyberpunk [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 TreixKeangly ⭐ ShibaFloki | 8% rewards to holders | locked liquidity pool | 24/7 marketing | x1000Gem 🚀

ShibaFloki Rewards Contract
Earn $SBF token by holding ShibaFloki.
It couldn’t be much easier
✅LP Locked
✅Public Contract - 0x1dBe34cB32EAF1fD0C11Ae353663530fF0A23Cb9
🎁 8% hourly Floki rewards automatically distributed in your wallet! Use our unique dashboard to keep track of your rewards!
📜Tokenomics
🔥• 8% Rewards
💥• 1% Added to LP
💢• 1% Marketing
💫• Total Supply: 1,000,000,000
Fast Tracked Listings, insane backing and partnerships and a massive marketing budget to send ShibaFloki and its holders on a one way ticket to space 🚀
Initial Liquidity Provided will be locked with Deeplock for 1 year. Max sells are limited to 1% of supply to avoid dumps.
The chat is opened, feel to ask the owner or administration staff any questions, they will be more than happy to assist you.
Additional info
ShibaFloki is a reflections token on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). ShibaFloki brings passive income for all holders. Simply hold $ShibaFloki tokens and get rewarded in $Floki on every transaction! With the auto-reward feature, you’ll receive both $Floki and $Cake automatically into your wallet every 60 minutes. If you find that you have NOT received any tokens, this could be due to low volume of transactions. Once they increase, the reward will be sent out.
🔥 LINKS:
Contract: 0x1dBe34cB32EAF1fD0C11Ae353663530fF0A23Cb9
Buy Here: https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0x1dBe34cB32EAF1fD0C11Ae353663530fF0A23Cb9
LP Locked: https://deeplock.io/lock/0xD458d854A61198c88F88Ee2dA4BeCb0CAEa25914
Renounced Ownership: https://bscscan.com/token/0x1dBe34cB32EAF1fD0C11Ae353663530fF0A23Cb9
submitted by TreixKeangly to CryptoMoon [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 ConfidentClub7722 49 male from the UK, looking for chat to help kill the boredom short or long term

Hey up for any type of chat and DMs are always open.
submitted by ConfidentClub7722 to MakeNewFriendsHere [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 donivanreddit Post your GPU and your hash rate… Curious to what others are getting. Thanks

submitted by donivanreddit to Unmineable [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 SomebodyClipRen I have broken more than 1300+ blox in OneBlock Skyblock, and the last time I played it, I was in the mining phase. But, it keeps saying "Upgrading in 10", but I don't switch phases. Help pls? P.S. I am stuck in the first phase.

I have broken more than 1300+ blox in OneBlock Skyblock, and the last time I played it, I was in the mining phase. But, it keeps saying
https://preview.redd.it/wuyu8scnqh281.png?width=368&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c242fe319eb2fde173b075e83f11055ff622a35
submitted by SomebodyClipRen to minecraftmaps [link] [comments]


2021.11.29 04:57 Hecker_1 Bruh

Bruh submitted by Hecker_1 to NANIKPosting [link] [comments]


http://manipulyators.ru